Why breasts are sexual.

 Myth 1. Most societies don't sexualize the breast.

Yes, breast fetishization isn't common in japan or African cultures. However, there is the case that some people don't know about their fetishes until they're exposed to them. Some anti-porn arguments say that people are warped by porn, but I believe that in order to be turned on, a certain part of the human mind has to be already attracted to it. Otherwise, trauma would need to be involved, and porn isn't that traumatic for the viewer. Exposure doesn't work either as people can ignore breast sexualization; they can be bored by the constant brigade of boobies. Not to mention that in African American and Latino communities, the butt still retained prominence in spite of the mass market focus on breasts and smaller butts. Furthermore, there are many areas where women don't cover their chests, so maybe the areas where breasts aren't sexualized are because people are dulled to the sight of them rather than them not being sexual.

Myth 2. Butts are evolutionarily advantageous, while breasts aren't.

They're right in the first part, but not in the second. There is also the case that only women are supposed to have breasts, and breasts, even small ones, indicate that the woman is a woman rather than a sexually immature child, as can be seen in breast ironing.

Notice: The rest of these myths aren't ones that I've commonly seen, they're from the one listicle in the second paragraph, I just need to stretch the article.

Myth 3. A Big Butt Is Healthier Than A Big Gut

What does that have to do with anything?

Myth 4. Not in a crystal ball sort of way, but studies have suggested that young women start to become more attuned to other people around the same time during puberty that they start developing curves. Evolutionary theorists think there could be a connection between emotional intelligence and butt size. Since men are often naturally attracted to women with a small waist and wide hips, those women have more pressure to develop social skills and instincts to help them judge potential mates.

That ignores how breasts can indicate the same thing.

Also, there's the portrait called Beauty Revealed, which was basically the artist's breasts. This was in 1828, before breast fetishism "went mainstream".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beauty_Revealed#Description_and_context

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Reconciling truth and the Conceptual.

 The Conceptual is the point of Conceptual Luciferianism. Ultimately, what's true will be at the level of individuals. However, this phase has not come yet, so now we are stuck under the truth. People say that the truth doesn't exist, but ultimately some events are more prominent than events that are merely possible; as of this moment, you are reading this instead of dancing. Out of all possible options and variations of options, you are experiencing one at the expense of others. You have can have A, B, or AB, but not both of these options, at least to their fullest extent, as B is separate from AB. The Conceptual is something to work towards or at least wait eagerly, but ultimately, ignoring the current truth isn't changing it, it's simply ignorance.
Read more

The Satanic Codes

 I. Hold yourself in the highest importance, regardless for those who you hold no debts. II. Hold your property as an extension of yourself. III. Pay your debts, as they aren't truly yours. IV. Never base your views on similarity alone.  One word may mean more than one word.   V. You do not have to respect the freedom of those who don't respect their own freedom or that of others. VI. When thinking, look first to the truth. Second, look to those you may hurt in your actions. Third, look at how you benefit. VII. The destruction of one's enemies, when justified logically and ethically, is a high pursuit.
Read more

Goetification and Infernomancy.

 I recently came across  this source,  which claimed that the Ars Goetia was bad because many female entities were made male. Ignoring the issues with their aversion, they act as if changing it would be bad. Most of these entities were Gods in solar paths. Reinterpreting them to allow the individual access to their power wouldn't be unjust. This process, which I call Goetification, is when deities that thrive of subjugation and destruction of the individual are made into engines for the use of Magick. Given the past of the previous woman-to-man gender flips, male-to-female creations will be allowed, so long as they aren't based on idpol. Another method would be Infernomancy, which would be trying to access the evil sides of solar paths, such as the near-universal sins of greed, lust, destruction of enemies, and praise of the self.
Read more