Agency and Satanic Panarchism.

 One of the Satanic Codes explains that freedom of others is reciprocal, and as such if people don't respect others' freedom, their own isn't respected.

But then there's the case of agency, a concept I have written out previously and will put here incase the google doc crashes:

Most people aged eighteen and above have a moral consciousness. They have a right to extend this agency unto objects that lack agency; this agency extends to other agents (people with agency) if all agents involved are involved consentually. Agents cannot force other agents to do things, nor refrain from doing things; attempting to commit force against agents will cause a suspension of agency against the aggressor. People have a negative right to objects because they have a capacity to extend their agency towards the object, but the object begins its existence with a lack of the agency. It is wrong to force agents to share objects, as the objects have agency from the agents that own them. It is wrong to violate agency as agents all have an equal agency, and thus lack the power to force their agency upon other agents.

The reason for agency is simple: what makes a person good? People would say good actions, but the problem with this is that not everyone commits good actions or bad actions. Sometimes people are simply neutral. They are not evil, they are not doing evil. But they still do not commit good actions. So if people could be seen as evil if they simply do nothing. The problem is that inaction doesn’t hurt anyone. Inaction doesn’t cause evil, actions do. Simply standing next to a murder isn’t causing a murder. People say you can do something so you are responsible, but that assumes people have that responsibility, even though people are individuals born blank slates, and as such are independent.

So what makes people ethical? Ethical beliefs, and conduct that is based on respecting ethics. This doesn’t mean you are required to help, you just don’t have to hurt. However, people with poor ethical beliefs can’t be considered ethical, because they don’t have good ethics. They shun ethical truth and try to replace it with unethical beliefs, and beliefs that are good are what make people good.

This isn’t to simply overturn actions, doing evil is still doing evil. It’s just that people can be bad for having bad beliefs.

But there is another aspect of agency: the ability to accept otherwise bad ideas. The way to do this is simple: acknowledge that the practice of these ideas is not from the actual ideas, but modified versions practiced among consenting participants. This will allow people to practice as they please without compromising the freedom of others.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Reconciling truth and the Conceptual.

 The Conceptual is the point of Conceptual Luciferianism. Ultimately, what's true will be at the level of individuals. However, this phase has not come yet, so now we are stuck under the truth. People say that the truth doesn't exist, but ultimately some events are more prominent than events that are merely possible; as of this moment, you are reading this instead of dancing. Out of all possible options and variations of options, you are experiencing one at the expense of others. You have can have A, B, or AB, but not both of these options, at least to their fullest extent, as B is separate from AB. The Conceptual is something to work towards or at least wait eagerly, but ultimately, ignoring the current truth isn't changing it, it's simply ignorance.
Read more

The Satanic Codes

 I. Hold yourself in the highest importance, regardless for those who you hold no debts. II. Hold your property as an extension of yourself. III. Pay your debts, as they aren't truly yours. IV. Never base your views on similarity alone.  One word may mean more than one word.   V. You do not have to respect the freedom of those who don't respect their own freedom or that of others. VI. When thinking, look first to the truth. Second, look to those you may hurt in your actions. Third, look at how you benefit. VII. The destruction of one's enemies, when justified logically and ethically, is a high pursuit.
Read more

Goetification and Infernomancy.

 I recently came across  this source,  which claimed that the Ars Goetia was bad because many female entities were made male. Ignoring the issues with their aversion, they act as if changing it would be bad. Most of these entities were Gods in solar paths. Reinterpreting them to allow the individual access to their power wouldn't be unjust. This process, which I call Goetification, is when deities that thrive of subjugation and destruction of the individual are made into engines for the use of Magick. Given the past of the previous woman-to-man gender flips, male-to-female creations will be allowed, so long as they aren't based on idpol. Another method would be Infernomancy, which would be trying to access the evil sides of solar paths, such as the near-universal sins of greed, lust, destruction of enemies, and praise of the self.
Read more